Manuel Moreno v. State
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-14-00022-CR
Manuel Moreno, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 299TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-DC-10-300666, HONORABLE KAREN SAGE, JUDGE PRESIDING
ORDER FOR CLERK TO PROVIDE A P P E L L A T E R E C O R D TO A P P E L L A N T
PER CURIAM
Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw supported by
a brief concluding that the instant appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Appellant’s counsel has certified to the Court that he provided copies
of the motion and brief to appellant, advised appellant of his right to examine the appellate
record and file a pro se response, and supplied appellant with a form motion for pro se access to
the appellate record. See Kelly v. State, No. PD-0702-13, 2014 WL 2865901, at *4 (Tex. Crim.
App. June 25, 2014). Appellant has timely filed the motion requesting access to the appellate
record with this Court.
Appellant’s pro se motion is granted. We hereby direct the clerk of the trial
court to provide a copy of the reporter’s record and clerk’s record to appellant, and to provide written verification to this Court of the date and manner in which the appellate record was
provided, on or before August 15, 2014. See id. Appellant has sixty days from the date he
receives the record to file his appellant’s brief. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.1.
It is ordered on August 5, 2014.
Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Field
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Manuel Moreno v. State (Manuel Moreno v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.