Manuel Landazuri-Espinoza v. United States

Ninth Circuit

Manuel Landazuri-Espinoza v. United States

421 F.2d 847

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 23, 1970

Docket24426

StatusPublished

This text of 421 F.2d 847 (Manuel Landazuri-Espinoza v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Manuel Landazuri-Espinoza v. United States, 421 F.2d 847 (9th Cir. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

After hearing oral argument and the concession of counsel for the appellant that reasonable force was used to detain appellant at the border, and considering the briefs on file herein, and the documentary evidence, now upon due consideration, it is the order of this court that appellant’s conviction on charges of smuggling 270 pounds of marijuana into the United States be, and the same is,

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

After hearing oral argument and the concession of counsel for the appellant that reasonable force was used to detain appellant at the border, and considering the briefs on file herein, and the documentary evidence, now upon due consideration, it is the order of this court that appellant’s conviction on charges of smuggling 270 pounds of marijuana into the United States be, and the same is,

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

421 F.2d 847, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manuel-landazuri-espinoza-v-united-states-ca9-1970.