Manuel Holbert Venable v. Ron Angelone, Director of Department of Corrections Park of Correction

Fourth Circuit

Manuel Holbert Venable v. Ron Angelone, Director of Department of Corrections Park of Correction

72 F.3d 128, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 39592, 1995 WL 752767

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedDecember 20, 1995

Docket95-7395

StatusPublished

This text of 72 F.3d 128 (Manuel Holbert Venable v. Ron Angelone, Director of Department of Corrections Park of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Manuel Holbert Venable v. Ron Angelone, Director of Department of Corrections Park of Correction, 72 F.3d 128, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 39592, 1995 WL 752767 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

72 F.3d 128
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Manuel Holbert VENABLE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Ron ANGELONE, Director of Department of Corrections; Park
of Correction, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-7395.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 28, 1995.
Decided Dec. 20, 1995.

Manuel Holbert Venable, Appellant Pro Se.

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Venable v. Angelone, No. CA-95-1045-AM (E.D.Va. Aug. 2, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

72 F.3d 128
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Manuel Holbert VENABLE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Ron ANGELONE, Director of Department of Corrections; Park
of Correction, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-7395.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 28, 1995.
Decided Dec. 20, 1995.

Manuel Holbert Venable, Appellant Pro Se.

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Venable v. Angelone, No. CA-95-1045-AM (E.D.Va. Aug. 2, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

72 F.3d 128, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 39592, 1995 WL 752767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manuel-holbert-venable-v-ron-angelone-director-of--ca4-1995.