Manuel H. Venable v. L. Douglas Wilder
This text of 966 F.2d 1446 (Manuel H. Venable v. L. Douglas Wilder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Manuel H. VENABLE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
L. Douglas WILDER, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 92-6348.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 1, 1992
Decided: June 12, 1992
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Chief District Judge. (CA-91-1618-AM)
Manuel H. Venable, Appellant Pro Se.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before PHILLIPS, WILKINSON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Manuel H. Venable appeals from the district court's order dismissing this civil action as frivolous under 28 U.S.C.s 1915(d) (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Venable v. Wilder, No. CA-91-1618-AM (E.D. Va. Dec. 5, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
966 F.2d 1446, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 22162, 1992 WL 132567, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manuel-h-venable-v-l-douglas-wilder-ca4-1992.