Manuel Garcia Ortiz v. Jefferson B. Sessions, III

712 F. App'x 589
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 26, 2018
Docket17-1252
StatusUnpublished

This text of 712 F. App'x 589 (Manuel Garcia Ortiz v. Jefferson B. Sessions, III) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Manuel Garcia Ortiz v. Jefferson B. Sessions, III, 712 F. App'x 589 (8th Cir. 2018).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Guatemalan citizen Manuel Garcia Ortiz petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal from the decision of an immigration judge (IJ), which denied him asylum and withholding of removal. 1 Ortiz sought immigration relief based on his membership in the particular social group “former members of the military suffering gang threats and violence due to nonin-volvement in their criminal behavior.”

After careful consideration of Ortiz’s arguments and the record, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the finding that he failed to show past persecution in Guatemala, a well-founded fear of future persecution there, or a clear probability of future persecution there, due to. one of the five protected grounds: race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion. See 8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(1)(B)(i); De Castro-Gutierrez v. Holder, 713 F.3d 375, 379 (8th Cir. 2013) (standard of review); Matul-Hernandez v. Holder, 685 F.3d 707, 711-13 (8th Cir. 2012). Specifically, we determine that: (1) Ortiz’s proposed group does not constitute a particular social group, see Gaitan v. Holder, 671 F.3d 678, 682 (8th Cir. 2012); (2) to the extent Ortiz feared general violence in Guatemala, his fear was not based on a protected ground, see Al Yatim v. Mukasey, 531 F.3d 584, 588-89 (8th Cir. 2008); and (3) he did not establish that the Guatemalan government was unable or unwilling to control the private actors he fears, see Gutierrez-Vidal v. Holder, 709 F.3d 728, 732 (8th Cir. 2013).

The petition is denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The IJ’s denial of relief under the Convention Against Torture is not on appeal. See Chay-Velasquez v. Ashcroft, 367 F.3d 751, 756 (8th Cir. 2004).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Oscar Granados Gaitan v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.
671 F.3d 678 (Eighth Circuit, 2012)
Julio Matul-Hernandez v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.
685 F.3d 707 (Eighth Circuit, 2012)
Alejandro Gutierrez-Vidal v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.
709 F.3d 728 (Eighth Circuit, 2013)
Rosa Gutierrez v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.
713 F.3d 375 (Eighth Circuit, 2013)
Al Yatim v. Mukasey
531 F.3d 584 (Eighth Circuit, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
712 F. App'x 589, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manuel-garcia-ortiz-v-jefferson-b-sessions-iii-ca8-2018.