Manuel Duff v. United States

239 F.2d 76
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedNovember 29, 1956
Docket13197_1
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 239 F.2d 76 (Manuel Duff v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Manuel Duff v. United States, 239 F.2d 76 (D.C. Cir. 1956).

Opinion

239 F.2d 76

99 U.S.App.D.C. 256

Manuel DUFF, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 13197.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued Nov. 20, 1956.
Decided Nov. 29, 1956.

Mrs. Jean F. Dwyer, Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Mr. Nathan J. Paulson, Asst. U.S. Atty., with whom Messrs. Oliver Gasch, U.S. Atty., and Lewis Carroll and Thomas A. Flannery, Asst. U.S. Attys., were on the brief, for appellee. Mr. Richard J. Snider, Asst. U.S. Atty., also entered an appearance for appellee.

Before EDGERTON, Chief Judge, and WILBUR K. MILLER and FAHY, Circuit judges.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a conviction for violations of the narcotics laws. We find no error affecting substantial rights.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Virginia McAllister v. United States
239 F.2d 76 (D.C. Circuit, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
239 F.2d 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manuel-duff-v-united-states-cadc-1956.