Manuel Caudillo-Villalobos v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
This text of 361 F.2d 329 (Manuel Caudillo-Villalobos v. Immigration and Naturalization Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Aside from procedural complaints which we find to be without merit, the only question of substance here is the correctness of the determination by the Board of Immigration Appeals that appellant made an “entry” into the United States after his conviction of a crime abroad involving moral turpitude. We think it clear that such entry was made when the facts are considered in light of the language in 8 U.S.C.A. § 1101(a) (13).
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
361 F.2d 329, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 5995, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manuel-caudillo-villalobos-v-immigration-and-naturalization-service-ca5-1966.