Manuel Caudillo-Villalobos v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
361 F.2d 329, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 5995
Opinion
Aside from procedural complaints which we find to be without merit, the only question of substance here is the correctness of the determination by the Board of Immigration Appeals that appellant made an “entry” into the United States after his conviction of a crime abroad involving moral turpitude. We think it clear that such entry was made when the facts are considered in light of the language in 8 U.S.C.A. § 1101(a) (13).
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Manuel Caudillo-Villalobos v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 361 F.2d 329, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 5995 (5th Cir. 1966).
361 F.2d 329 (Manuel Caudillo-Villalobos v. Immigration and Naturalization Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
ACOSTA
14 I. & N. Dec. 666 (Board of Immigration Appeals, 1974)
VARGAS-BANUELOS
13 I. & N. Dec. 810 (Board of Immigration Appeals, 1971)
WOOD
12 I. & N. Dec. 170 (Board of Immigration Appeals, 1967)