Manuel Calixto Rojas De Diaz, A/K/A Carlos Rojas v. United States
This text of 352 F.2d 76 (Manuel Calixto Rojas De Diaz, A/K/A Carlos Rojas v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal attacks the conviction and sentence of appellant on the sole ground of insufficiency of the evidence. The conviction was based largely upon the testimony of a Federal Narcotics Bureau agent.
We conclude that the testimony of this agent, together with corroborating evidence, touching the time and place of the several transactions, was sufficient to meet the test. We are unable to determine that reasonable minds could not find that the evidence excludes every hypothesis but that of guilt. Kaplan v. United States, 9th Cir., 329 F.2d 561, 563.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
352 F.2d 76, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 4097, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manuel-calixto-rojas-de-diaz-aka-carlos-rojas-v-united-states-ca5-1965.