Manuel Baker v. Celia Radow
274 F.2d 751, 107 U.S. App. D.C. 93, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 5695
This text of 274 F.2d 751 (Manuel Baker v. Celia Radow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Manuel Baker v. Celia Radow, 274 F.2d 751, 107 U.S. App. D.C. 93, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 5695 (D.C. Cir. 1960).
Opinion
Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment against him in appellee’s suit for damages resulting from an automobile collision. His primary point, that the court *752 erred in refusing to direct a verdict in his favor, rests on his contention that some of the testimony against him was inherently incredible. We find no error.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
274 F.2d 751, 107 U.S. App. D.C. 93, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 5695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manuel-baker-v-celia-radow-cadc-1960.