Manuel Baker v. Celia Radow
274 F.2d 751, 107 U.S. App. D.C. 93, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 5695
Opinion
Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment against him in appellee’s suit for damages resulting from an automobile collision. His primary point, that the court *752 erred in refusing to direct a verdict in his favor, rests on his contention that some of the testimony against him was inherently incredible. We find no error.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Manuel Baker v. Celia Radow, 274 F.2d 751, 107 U.S. App. D.C. 93, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 5695 (D.C. Cir. 1960).
274 F.2d 751 (Manuel Baker v. Celia Radow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.