Manuel Andrade v. Beacon Sales Acquisition, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California·Decided February 6, 2020·No. 2:19-cv-06963·Unknown

Opinion

1 || Joshua Cohen Slatkin (SBN 285090) LAW OFFICE OF JOSHUA COHEN SLATKIN 2 || 11726 San Vicente Blvd., Suite 200 Los Angeles, CA 90049 3 || Telephone: (310)627-2699 Facsimile: (310) 943-2757 4 Email: jcohenslatkin @jcslaw4you.com 5 || Arnab Banerjee (SBN 252618) BANNER LAW GROUP, P.C. 6 || 11755 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1250 Los Angeles, California 90025 7 || Email: Arnab@bannerlawgroup.com Telephone: (323) 426-2991 8 || Facsimile: (323) 426-2975 9 || Attorneys for Plaintiff MANUEL ANDRADE 10 || KARIN M. COGBILL, Bar No. 244606 kcogbill@ hopkinscarley.com 11 || HOPKINS & CARLEY A Law Corporation 12 || The Letitia Building 70 S First Street 13 || San Jose, CA 95113-2406 14 || mailing address: P.O. Box 1469 15 San Jose, CA 95109-1469 Telephone: (408) 286-9800 16 || Facsimile: (408) 998-4790 17 || Attorneys for Defendants BEACON SALES ACQUISITION, INC.; BEACON 18 || ROOFING SUPPLY, INC. 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 20 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 21 MANUEL ANDRADE, on behalf of Case No. 2:19-cv-06963-CJC (RAOx) 22 || himself and all others similarly situated, [PROPOSED] STIPULATED 23 Plaintiff, PROTECTIVE ORDER 24 Vv. 2) | BEACON SALES ACQUISITION, INC.; BEACON ROOFING SUPPLY, INC.; and gd. 26 DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Complaint filed: March 26, 2019 27 Defendants. 28 Case No. 2:19-cv-06963-CJC (RAOx)

1] 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 2 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private 3 || information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other 4 || than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and 5 || petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this 6 || Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the 7 || protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items 8 || that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The parties further 9 || acknowledge, as set forth in Paragraph 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not 10 || entitle them to file confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures 11 || that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the 12 || court to file material under seal. 14 This action involves allegations that third party employees were subjected to various Labor 15 || Code violations. The claims implicate potentially confidential information (including information 16 || implicating privacy rights of third parties), information otherwise generally unavailable to the public, 17 || or which may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under state or federal statutes, court 18 || rules, case decisions, or common law. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate 19 || the prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately protect 20 || information the parties are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that the parties are permitted 21 || reasonable necessary uses of such material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address 22 || their handling at the end of the litigation, and serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such 23 || information is justified in this matter. It is the intent of the parties that information will not be 24 || designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing be so designated without a good faith 25 || belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, non-public manner, and there is good cause why it 26 || should not be part of the public record of this case. 27 2. DEFINITIONS 28 at 1. Case No. 2:19-cv-06963-CJC (RAOx)

1 2.1 Action: Andrade v. Beacon Sales Acquisition, Inc., et al., pending in the Central District 2 || of California, Case No. 2:19-cv-06963-CJC (RAOx). 3 2.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of information 4 || or items under this Order. 5 2.3 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is 6 || generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of 7 || Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in the Good Cause Statement. 8 2.4 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as their support staff). 9 2.5 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it 10 || produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 11 2.6 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium 12 || or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, 13 || transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to 14 || discovery in this matter. 15 2.7. Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to the 16 || litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant 17 || in this Action. 18 2.8 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this Action. House Counsel 19 || does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 20 2.9 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal 21 || entity not named as a Party to this action. 22 2.10 Qutside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this Action 23 || but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action and have appeared in this Action on behalf 24 || of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party, and includes 25 || support staff. 26 2.11 Party: any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, 27 || consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 28 at 2. Case No. 2:19-cv-06963-CJC (RAOx)

1 2.12 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material 2 || in this Action. 3 2.13. Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services (e.g., 4 || photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, storing, 5 || or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors. 6 2.14 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as 7 || “CONFIDENTIAL.” 8 2.15 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a 9 || Producing Party. 10 3. SCOPE 11 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material (as 12 || defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all 13 || copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, 14 || conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. 15 Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by the orders of the trial judge. This 16 || Order does not govern the use of Protected Material at trial 17 4, DURATION 18 Once a case proceeds to trial, all of the court-filed information to be introduced that was 19 || previously designated as confidential or maintained pursuant to this protective order becomes public 20 || and will be presumptively available to all members of the public, including the press, unless 21 || compelling reasons supported by specific factual findings to proceed otherwise are made to the trial 22 || judge in advance of the trial. See Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1180-81 23 || (9th Cir.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Manuel Andrade v. Beacon Sales Acquisition, Inc., (C.D. Cal. 2020).

Manuel Andrade v. Beacon Sales Acquisition, Inc. (Manuel Andrade v. Beacon Sales Acquisition, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)