Manuel Abelardo Rojas v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 19, 2016
Docket13-16-00229-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Manuel Abelardo Rojas v. State (Manuel Abelardo Rojas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Manuel Abelardo Rojas v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-16-00229-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

MANUEL ABELARDO ROJAS, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 370th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Manuel Abelardo Rojas, attempts a second appeal of his August 13,

2008 conviction for indecency with a child in trial court cause number CR-1349-08-G. This Court previously issued a memorandum opinion and judgment on January 15, 2009,

regarding this trial court cause number in cause number 13-08-000673-CR.1

This Court lacks jurisdiction to consider a second appeal from appellant’s final

conviction. The exclusive post-conviction remedy in final felony convictions in Texas

courts is through a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to Texas Code of Criminal Procedure

11.07. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07, § 5 (West, Westlaw through 2015 R.S.)

(providing that “[a]fter conviction, the procedure outlined in this Act shall be exclusive and

any other proceeding shall be void and of no force and effect in discharging the prisoner”);

Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S. W.2d 241 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).

Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP.

P.42.3(a), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 19th day of May, 2016.

1 This Court dismissed the appeal because the trial court’s certification did not show the defendant had the right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals
802 S.W.2d 241 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Manuel Abelardo Rojas v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manuel-abelardo-rojas-v-state-texapp-2016.