Mantovano v. LaBarbera
This text of 276 A.D.2d 600 (Mantovano v. LaBarbera) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Ford Credit Titling Trust appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barasch, J.), dated July 29, 1999, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellant, and the action against the remaining defendants is severed.
[601]*601For the reasons stated in Beddingfield, v LaBarbera (276 AD2d 575 [decided herewith]), the appellant’s motion for summary judgment should have been granted. O’Brien, J. P., Altman, Krausman and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
276 A.D.2d 600, 714 N.Y.S.2d 905, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10408, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mantovano-v-labarbera-nyappdiv-2000.