Manto v. Manto

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Manto v. Manto

509 So. 2d 981, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1681, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9302

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 8, 1987

DocketNo. 86-2398

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 509 So. 2d 981 (Manto v. Manto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Manto v. Manto, 509 So. 2d 981, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1681, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9302 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

FRANK, Judge.

The appellant, Patricia Manto, disputes the trial court’s failure to incorporate in the final judgment the disposition of a $25,000 second mortgage placed upon the marital home. The proceeds of the mortgage appear to have been or are being used by the ex-husband in connection with the maintenance and operation of a business venture. The ex-wife and ex-husband are now tenants in common in the marital home. We, therefore, remand this matter to the trial court for the entry of an amended final judgment in which it is provided that upon the sale of the marital home the second mortgage is to be satisfied from the husband’s share of the proceeds. See Pace v. Pace, 427 So.2d 232 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). In all other respects the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Marcoux v. Marcoux, 464 So.2d 542 (Fla.1985).

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and THREADGILL, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FRANK, Judge.

The appellant, Patricia Manto, disputes the trial court’s failure to incorporate in the final judgment the disposition of a $25,000 second mortgage placed upon the marital home. The proceeds of the mortgage appear to have been or are being used by the ex-husband in connection with the maintenance and operation of a business venture. The ex-wife and ex-husband are now tenants in common in the marital home. We, therefore, remand this matter to the trial court for the entry of an amended final judgment in which it is provided that upon the sale of the marital home the second mortgage is to be satisfied from the husband’s share of the proceeds. See Pace v. Pace, 427 So.2d 232 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). In all other respects the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Marcoux v. Marcoux, 464 So.2d 542 (Fla.1985).

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and THREADGILL, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

509 So. 2d 981, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1681, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manto-v-manto-fladistctapp-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack