Mantilla v. Goldstein

608 So. 2d 828, 1992 WL 249582
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 7, 1992·No. No. 92-01740·Published

Opinion

Whether a criminal record should be sealed or expunged involves the exercise of judicial discretion, Hernandez v. State, 603 So.2d 105 (Fla.3d DCA 1992), as to which mandamus does not lie. Kloski v. Matecumbe Marina, Inc., 598 So.2d 275 (Fla.3d DCA 1992) (Mandamus not a vehicle to command performance of an act where public officer has discretion).

Mandamus is denied without prejudice to appeal.

NESBITT, FERGUSON and GODERICH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mantilla v. Goldstein, 608 So. 2d 828, 1992 WL 249582 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

608 So. 2d 828 (Mantilla v. Goldstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kloski v. Matecumbe Marina, Inc.
598 So. 2d 275 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Hernandez v. State
603 So. 2d 105 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)