Mantici v. State
406 So. 2d 99, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21730
Opinion
Severe and prejudicial limitations imposed by the court on defense counsel’s efforts to question witnesses during both direct and cross-examination concerning testimony elicited by the state deprived defendant Mantici of a fair trial and mandate reversal of his convictions. Morrell v. State, 335 So.2d 836 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976); Kirkland v. State, 185 So.2d 5 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966); Art. I, § 16, Fla.Const. (1968).
Reversed and remanded for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mantici v. State, 406 So. 2d 99, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21730 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).
406 So. 2d 99 (Mantici v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Morrell v. State
335 So. 2d 836 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
Kirkland v. State
185 So. 2d 5 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)