Manter v. Picot

Supreme Court of Missouri

Manter v. Picot

33 Mo. 490

CourtSupreme Court of Missouri

DecidedMarch 15, 1863

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 33 Mo. 490 (Manter v. Picot) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Manter v. Picot, 33 Mo. 490 (Mo. 1863).

Pincite

Opinion

Bates, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The only question in this case is substantially decided in the case of the same plaintiffs against Kellogg, 28 Mo. 404.

We do not doubt at all that Knox’s northern boundary line, mentioned in his deed to Deaver, was his true northern boundary line, and therefore the deed conveyed the land in dispute, leaving no land at that place which could be conveyed by his deed to Derwart, under which the plaintiffs claim.

Judgment affirmed.

Judges Bay and Dryden concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bates, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The only question in this case is substantially decided in the case of the same plaintiffs against Kellogg, 28 Mo. 404.

We do not doubt at all that Knox’s northern boundary line, mentioned in his deed to Deaver, was his true northern boundary line, and therefore the deed conveyed the land in dispute, leaving no land at that place which could be conveyed by his deed to Derwart, under which the plaintiffs claim.

Judgment affirmed.

Judges Bay and Dryden concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 Mo. 490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manter-v-picot-mo-1863.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack