Mantella v. City of Little Falls
This text of 235 A.D. 655 (Mantella v. City of Little Falls) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
As to the defendant City of Little Falls, judgment and order reversed on the law and facts, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. (Roberts v. Town of Eaton, 238 N. Y. 420; Best v. State of New York, 203 App. Div. 339; affd., 236 N. Y. 662.) As to the defendant Todaro, judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Sears, P. J., and Taylor, J., who dissent on the facts as to the defendant Todaro and vote for reversal and a new trial as to him. Present •— Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgeomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
235 A.D. 655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mantella-v-city-of-little-falls-nyappdiv-1932.