Mantella v. City of Little Falls
235 A.D. 655
Opinion
As to the defendant City of Little Falls, judgment and order reversed on the law and facts, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. (Roberts v. Town of Eaton, 238 N. Y. 420; Best v. State of New York, 203 App. Div. 339; affd., 236 N. Y. 662.) As to the defendant Todaro, judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Sears, P. J., and Taylor, J., who dissent on the facts as to the defendant Todaro and vote for reversal and a new trial as to him. Present •— Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgeomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mantella v. City of Little Falls, 235 A.D. 655 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).
235 A.D. 655 (Mantella v. City of Little Falls) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Best v. . State of New York
142 N.E. 325 (New York Court of Appeals, 1923)
Roberts v. . Town of Eaton
144 N.E. 667 (New York Court of Appeals, 1924)
Best v. State
203 A.D. 339 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1922)