Mantell v. Cuyahoga Cty. Prosecutor's Office
Opinion
[Cite as Mantell v. Cuyahoga Cty. Prosecutor's Office, 2023-Ohio-3619.]
IN THE COURT OF CLAIMS OF OHIO
GREG MANTELL Case No. 2023-00225PQ
Requester Judge Lisa L. Sadler
v. JUDGMENT ENTRY
CUYAHOGA COUNTY PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE
Respondent
{¶1} In this public-records case, a Special Master has issued a Report and Recommendation (R&R). The Special Master recommends that judgment be entered for Respondent and that Requester bear the costs of this case. (R&R, 1, 10.) {¶2} Neither Requester nor Respondent has filed timely written objections to the Report and Recommendation in accordance with R.C. 2743.75(F)(2). Pursuant to R.C. 2743.75(F)(2), if neither party timely objects, then this Court “shall promptly issue a final order adopting the report and recommendation, unless it determines that there is an error of law or other defect evident on the face of the report and recommendation.” Upon independent review, the Court finds that there is no error of law or other defect evident on the face of the Report and Recommendation. The Court therefore adopts the Report and Recommendation. Case No. 2023-00225PQ -2- ENTRY
{¶3} In accordance with the Special Master’s recommendations, judgment is entered in favor of Respondent. Court costs are assessed to Requester. The Clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal.
LISA L. SADLER Judge
Filed September 14, 2023 Sent to S.C. Reporter 10/5/23
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2023 Ohio 3619 (Mantell v. Cuyahoga Cty. Prosecutor's Office) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.