Mantell v. Connor
This text of 231 A.D. 737 (Mantell v. Connor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying defendants’ motion to vacate notice of examination of defendant Peter Connor before trial affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements; examination to proceed on five days’ notice before the county judge of Nassau county at the place and hour stated in the order. The subject-matter of this examination is not necessarily the same as the subject-matter involved in the indictment. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur; Kapper, J., dissents and votes for reversal upon the ground that said defendant is under indictment in connection with the work upon which, in whole or in part, plaintiff seeks to recover and should not be subjected to an examination before trial as a matter of sound discretion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
231 A.D. 737, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mantell-v-connor-nyappdiv-1930.