Mansur v. Keaton

46 Me. 346
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided July 1, 1859·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Davis, J.

The facts proved, and offered to be proved, do not constitute a consummated payment, or accord and satisfaction. The plaintiff having neglected or declined to carry out the arrangement, the Staekpole execution is still the property of the defendant. Exceptions overruled.

Tenney, C. J., and Appleton, Cutting, May, and Kent, J. J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mansur v. Keaton, 46 Me. 346 (Me. 1859).

46 Me. 346 (Mansur v. Keaton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Continental Gin Co. v. Arnold
1915 OK 960 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915)
Houston Bros. v. Wagner
1911 OK 94 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1911)