Home/Supreme Judicial Court of Maine/Mansur v. Keaton

Mansur v. Keaton

46 Me. 346
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedJuly 1, 1859
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 46 Me. 346 (Mansur v. Keaton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mansur v. Keaton, 46 Me. 346 (Me. 1859).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Davis, J.

The facts proved, and offered to be proved, do not constitute a consummated payment, or accord and satisfaction. The plaintiff having neglected or declined to carry out the arrangement, the Staekpole execution is still the property of the defendant. Exceptions overruled.

Tenney, C. J., and Appleton, Cutting, May, and Kent, J. J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Continental Gin Co. v. Arnold
1915 OK 960 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915)
Houston Bros. v. Wagner
1911 OK 94 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 Me. 346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mansur-v-keaton-me-1859.