Mansur v. Keaton
46 Me. 346
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
The facts proved, and offered to be proved, do not constitute a consummated payment, or accord and satisfaction. The plaintiff having neglected or declined to carry out the arrangement, the Staekpole execution is still the property of the defendant. Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mansur v. Keaton, 46 Me. 346 (Me. 1859).
46 Me. 346 (Mansur v. Keaton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Continental Gin Co. v. Arnold
1915 OK 960 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915)
Houston Bros. v. Wagner
1911 OK 94 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1911)