Mansour v. Massey

336 S.E.2d 15, 287 S.C. 176, 1985 S.C. LEXIS 482
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided October 25, 1985·No. 22393·Published

Opinion

Ness, Chief Justice:

Respondent Mansour brought suit against four defendants to recover a debt for liquor sold. Three of the defendants were never served. The trial judge granted an involuntary nonsuit without prejudice as to the three defendants not served, and entered judgment against appellant Leake. We reverse.

The complaint seeks recovery against four defendants, purportedly on the basis of a joint and several debt. Man-sour’s testimony was ambiguous as to whether he sought recovery against the defendants individually or on the basis of partnership liability. Leake asserted the debt was a corporate debt. The trial judge found the capacity of the parties *177 was unclear, but he granted judgment in full against Leake based on his personal liability for partnership debts.

Individual partners are jointly liable for partnership debts. S. C. Code Ann. Section 33-41-370(2) (1976). All partners must be joined in an action for a partnership debt. Palmetto Production Credit Association v. Wilson, 257 S. C. 13, 183 S. E. (2d) 565 (1971); White v. Jackson, 252 S. C. 274, 166 S. E. (2d) 211 (1969).

The trial judge erred in entering judgment against Leake in the absence of the other partners. The judgment below is reversed.

Reversed.

Gregory, Harwell, Chandler and Finney, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mansour v. Massey, 336 S.E.2d 15, 287 S.C. 176, 1985 S.C. LEXIS 482 (S.C. 1985).

336 S.E.2d 15 (Mansour v. Massey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

White v. Jackson
166 S.E.2d 211 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1969)
PALMETTO PRODUCTION CREDIT ASSOC. v. Willson
183 S.E.2d 565 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1971)