Mansour v. International Railway Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mansour v. International Railway Co.

256 A.D. 892, 9 N.Y.S.2d 792, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9261

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 11, 1939·Published

Opinion

Judgments affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Finding no proof of a breach of legal duty oy either defendant we affirm the judgments based upon the ruling which granted their motions for nonsuit at the close of the plaintiff’s evidence. All concur. (The judgments are for defendants in an action for damages for personal injuries sustained by reason of an automobile colliding with a post.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgments affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Finding no proof of a breach of legal duty oy either defendant we affirm the judgments based upon the ruling which granted their motions for nonsuit at the close of the plaintiff’s evidence. All concur. (The judgments are for defendants in an action for damages for personal injuries sustained by reason of an automobile colliding with a post.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.

Mansour v. International Railway Co., 256 A.D. 892, 9 N.Y.S.2d 792, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9261 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

256 A.D. 892 (Mansour v. International Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.