Manson v. Robinson

37 Wis. 339
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1875
StatusPublished

This text of 37 Wis. 339 (Manson v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Manson v. Robinson, 37 Wis. 339 (Wis. 1875).

Opinion

Ryan, C. J.

The verdict of the jury was considerably in excess of the amount claimed in the complaint. Something is said in the briefs of counsel on the subject of a remittitur, but there is none in the record, to which alone we can look. The motion for a tiew trial, if denied, should have been denied only upon condition that the respondent enter a remittitur of the excess.

The other grounds set up by the appellant for a new trial went to the discretion of the court below ; and there does not appear to have been an abuse of a sound discretion in the denial of the motion, so far as it rested on those grounds.

But the order of the court below overruling the motion, without making it a condition of the order that the respondent should remit the excess of damages found by the jury, was * erroneous, and must be reversed.

By the Court, — Order reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 Wis. 339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manson-v-robinson-wis-1875.