Manson v. Fresno Housing Authority

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 CHRISTOPHER MANSON, et al., No. 1:23-cv-00679-KES-SKO

11 Plaintiffs, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE 12 v. (Doc. 71) 13 FRESNO HOUSING AUTHORITY, et al.,

14 Defendants. 15

16 17 18 On June 2, 2025, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action with prejudice. 19 (Doc. 71.) In light of the parties’ stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 20 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been 21 dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close administratively this 22 case.1 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 Dated: June 3, 2025 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 1 The parties previously stipulated to the retention of jurisdiction by this Court to enforce the terms of the parties’ 28 written settlement agreement. (See Doc. 70.)