Manshul Construction Corp. v. Genetech Building Systems, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Manshul Construction Corp. v. Genetech Building Systems, Inc.

244 A.D.2d 412, 665 N.Y.S.2d 562, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11240

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 10, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 244 A.D.2d 412 (Manshul Construction Corp. v. Genetech Building Systems, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Manshul Construction Corp. v. Genetech Building Systems, Inc., 244 A.D.2d 412, 665 N.Y.S.2d 562, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11240 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to [413]*413stay arbitration, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (O’Donoghue, J.), dated March 13, 1996, which, inter alia, denied its motion to stay arbitration, granted the respondent’s cross motion to compel arbitration, and appointed the American Arbitration Association as a successor arbitrator.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention on appeal, the Supreme Court correctly appointed the American Arbitration Association as a successor arbitrator (see, Matter of Klines [Green], 2 AD2d 373, affd 3 NY2d 816; 5 NY Jur 2d, Arbitration and Award, § 65).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are either without merit or not properly before this Court. Thompson, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Joy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to [413]*413stay arbitration, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (O’Donoghue, J.), dated March 13, 1996, which, inter alia, denied its motion to stay arbitration, granted the respondent’s cross motion to compel arbitration, and appointed the American Arbitration Association as a successor arbitrator.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention on appeal, the Supreme Court correctly appointed the American Arbitration Association as a successor arbitrator (see, Matter of Klines [Green], 2 AD2d 373, affd 3 NY2d 816; 5 NY Jur 2d, Arbitration and Award, § 65).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are either without merit or not properly before this Court. Thompson, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Joy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

244 A.D.2d 412, 665 N.Y.S.2d 562, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manshul-construction-corp-v-genetech-building-systems-inc-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack