Mansfield v. State
326 S.W.3d 853, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1702, 2010 WL 5084511
Opinion
ORDER
Glenn Mansfield appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mansfield v. State, 326 S.W.3d 853, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1702, 2010 WL 5084511 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).
326 S.W.3d 853 (Mansfield v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Reiner v. City of Eureka
326 S.W.3d 853 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)