Mansfield v. Orange Inv. Co.

263 S.W. 658, 1924 Tex. App. LEXIS 1115
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 26, 1924·No. No. 1085.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

WALKER, J.

Since the filing of our opinion on original submission in this case, appellants have filed a petition for certiorari, asking permission to bring up tbeir bill of exception complaining. of the action of the court in overruling thejr challenges to the jurors, wherein is set forth the full interrogation of the jurors on the issue of their qualification. This motion comes too late. After we have entered a judgment on' the record as before us,” we are not permitted, by tbe rules governing our court, to permit an amendment or correction or addition to the transcript. Woolley v. Nelson (Tex. Civ. App.) 250 S. W. 481.

Appellants’ motion for rehearing, after being carefully reviewed by us, is in all things overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mansfield v. Orange Inv. Co., 263 S.W. 658, 1924 Tex. App. LEXIS 1115 (Tex. Ct. App. 1924).

263 S.W. 658 (Mansfield v. Orange Inv. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

White v. White
15 S.W.2d 1090 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1929)
Kentucky Oil Corp. v. McCandless
300 S.W. 972 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1927)