Mansfield v. Frankfort & Cincinnati Railway Co.

234 S.W. 956, 193 Ky. 95, 1921 Ky. LEXIS 185
Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided November 29, 1921·Published

Opinion

Opinion op the Court by

Chief Justice Hurt

Reversing.

The question presented upon this appeal is whether a corporation engaged in the operation of a railroad is under a duty to maintain cattle guards where a private passway crosses its tracks, at the place and under the circumstances presented in this record, for the protection of the cattle of one of the general public, and other than the one for whom the passway is maintained. The situation and circumstances can best be illustrated by the following diagram:

[96]*96

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mansfield v. Frankfort & Cincinnati Railway Co., 234 S.W. 956, 193 Ky. 95, 1921 Ky. LEXIS 185 (Ky. Ct. App. 1921).

234 S.W. 956 (Mansfield v. Frankfort & Cincinnati Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McKee v. C., N. O. & T. P. Ry. Company's Receiver
43 S.W. 241 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1897)
Payton v. Louisville & N. R. R.
72 S.W. 346 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1903)
Parrish v. Louisville & N. R. R.
104 S.W. 690 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1907)