Mansfield v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mansfield v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.

259 A.D. 1016, 21 N.Y.S.2d 157, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7783

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 3, 1940·Published

Opinion

Action by plaintiff-wife for personal injuries suffered by a fall, caused by a hole in the pavement within the track area of the appellant Transit Corporation, and by her husband for loss of consortium and medical expenses. On appeal by defendant-appellant, the judgment is unanimously affirmed, with costs to the plaintiffis-appellants. On appeal by plaintiffs-appellants, the judgment, in so far as appealed from, is unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action by plaintiff-wife for personal injuries suffered by a fall, caused by a hole in the pavement within the track area of the appellant Transit Corporation, and by her husband for loss of consortium and medical expenses. On appeal by defendant-appellant, the judgment is unanimously affirmed, with costs to the plaintiffis-appellants. On appeal by plaintiffs-appellants, the judgment, in so far as appealed from, is unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ.

Mansfield v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp., 259 A.D. 1016, 21 N.Y.S.2d 157, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7783 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

259 A.D. 1016 (Mansfield v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.