Mansfield v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.
This text of 259 A.D. 1016 (Mansfield v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Action by plaintiff-wife for personal injuries suffered by a fall, caused by a hole in the pavement within the track area of the appellant Transit Corporation, and by her husband for loss of consortium and medical expenses. On appeal by defendant-appellant, the judgment is unanimously affirmed, with costs to the plaintiffis-appellants. On appeal by plaintiffs-appellants, the judgment, in so far as appealed from, is unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
259 A.D. 1016, 21 N.Y.S.2d 157, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7783, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mansfield-v-brooklyn-queens-transit-corp-nyappdiv-1940.