Mansfield v. Allen

85 Mo. 502
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided April 15, 1885·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

Sherwood, J.

In our opinion, Allen was improperly made a party defendant, but this ought not to authorize a reversal of the judgment, under the liberal provisions ©f our statute respecting practice in civil cases. Sections 3570, 3582, 3583. See, also, Wescott v. Bridwell, 40 Mo. 146 ; City, etc., v. Bressler, 56 Mo. 350. We, therefore, modify the judgment by reversing it as to Allen, and affirming it as to Bassett.

Norton and Ray, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mansfield v. Allen, 85 Mo. 502 (Mo. 1885).

85 Mo. 502 (Mansfield v. Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stotler ex rel. Stotler v. Chicago & Alton Railway Co.
98 S.W. 509 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1906)
Hemelreich v. Carlos
24 Mo. App. 264 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1887)
Thomas v. Zumbalen
43 Mo. 471 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1869)