Mansfield Coal & Coke Co. v. Boice

30 A. 502, 165 Pa. 27, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 921
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedNovember 12, 1894
DocketAppeal, No. 225
StatusPublished

This text of 30 A. 502 (Mansfield Coal & Coke Co. v. Boice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mansfield Coal & Coke Co. v. Boice, 30 A. 502, 165 Pa. 27, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 921 (Pa. 1894).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The difficulty with the case of the defendants is that Priscilla Boice, under whose will they claim title, had no estate whatever in the land in question, either legal or equitable, which it was possible for her to pass by' any devise she could make. The estate absolutely ceased with her life. No title by election could be acquired under her will against an intervening purchaser without notice, and the authorities upon that subject are not applicable to the contention. She had no title to transmit, and the land vested in her heirs at her death by virtue of the original deed from John" McMichael to her trustee. However the acts of her children in accepting the legacies given them by her will might have affected them, there was no offer to prove any notice of those acts to the plaintiff, and as to it they were nugatory.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 A. 502, 165 Pa. 27, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 921, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mansfield-coal-coke-co-v-boice-pa-1894.