Mansaray v. Krous Security Service

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided March 1, 2021·No. 1:20-cv-01415·Unknown

Opinion

USDC-SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC#: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: 03/01/2021

MOHAMED K. MANSARAY, Plaintiff, y No. 20-CV-1415 (RA) KRAUS SECURITY SYSTEMS AND ORDER ALFRED ROBINSON, SECURITY DIRECTOR, Defendants.

RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: On January 19, 2021, the Court granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ complaint. See Dkt. 22; Mansaray v. Kraus Sec. Sys., 2021 WL 183275 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 19, 2021). The Court granted Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint to cure the deficiencies identified in the opinion and order. Any amended complaint was to be filed no later than February 19, 2021, and the Court stated that “[i]f Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint by that date, this case will be dismissed with prejudice.” That date having passed without the filing of an amended complaint, this action is hereby dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment for Defendants and to close this case. SO ORDERED. Dated: March 1, 2021 □□□ , New York, New York / —— Ronnie Abrams United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mansaray v. Krous Security Service, (S.D.N.Y. 2021).

Mansaray v. Krous Security Service (Mansaray v. Krous Security Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.