Manry v. Stephens

5 S.E.2d 9, 188 Ga. 822, 1939 Ga. LEXIS 631
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 13, 1939
DocketNo. 12996
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 5 S.E.2d 9 (Manry v. Stephens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Manry v. Stephens, 5 S.E.2d 9, 188 Ga. 822, 1939 Ga. LEXIS 631 (Ga. 1939).

Opinion

Grice, Justice.

Where the sole assignment of error relates to the refusal to grant a new trial in a case wherein the petition of the plaintiff sought only to enjoin a sale, and when on the call of the ease for argument in this court it is made to appear, without contradiction, [823]*823that the sale has taken place, the restraining order theretofore passed having been revoked before the sale, and no supersedeas granted, the only question involved has become moot. Samuels v. Lanford, 149 Ga. 167 (99 S. E. 532).

No. 12996. September 13, 1939. Rehearing denied October 13, 1939. J. B. Terrell and B. H. Manry, for plaintiff. Willingham & Willingham, for defendant.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hale v. Sullivan
362 P.2d 402 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1961)
Manry v. Stephens
9 S.E.2d 58 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 S.E.2d 9, 188 Ga. 822, 1939 Ga. LEXIS 631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manry-v-stephens-ga-1939.