Manry v. First National Bank
Opinion
The court did not err in sustaining a general demurrer to the plaintiffs’ suit, one ground of which was that the same “shows on its face that the relief prayed for can. not be granted as against this [54]*54defendant,” the sole defendant being a national banking association, and the only prayer, besides the one for process, being that an injunction issue, before a final judgment. The instant case can not on principle be distinguished from, and is controlled by, National Bank of Savannah v. Craven, 147 Ga. 753 (95 S. E. 246); American National Bank of Macon v. Dure, 148 Ga. 498 (97 S. E. 70); Hill v. First National Bank of West Point, 163 Ga. 458 (136 S. E. 437); Garrard v. Milledgeville Banking Co., 171 Ga. 247 (155 S. E. 40).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2 S.E.2d 645 (Manry v. First National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.