Manry v. First National Bank

2 S.E.2d 645, 188 Ga. 53, 1939 Ga. LEXIS 468
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided April 12, 1939·No. No. 12772·Published

Opinion

Grice, Justice.

The court did not err in sustaining a general demurrer to the plaintiffs’ suit, one ground of which was that the same “shows on its face that the relief prayed for can. not be granted as against this [54]*54defendant,” the sole defendant being a national banking association, and the only prayer, besides the one for process, being that an injunction issue, before a final judgment. The instant case can not on principle be distinguished from, and is controlled by, National Bank of Savannah v. Craven, 147 Ga. 753 (95 S. E. 246); American National Bank of Macon v. Dure, 148 Ga. 498 (97 S. E. 70); Hill v. First National Bank of West Point, 163 Ga. 458 (136 S. E. 437); Garrard v. Milledgeville Banking Co., 171 Ga. 247 (155 S. E. 40).

No. 12772. April 12, 1939. J. B. Ten-ell, for plaintiffs. Hwrvey J. Kennedy, for defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Manry v. First National Bank, 2 S.E.2d 645, 188 Ga. 53, 1939 Ga. LEXIS 468 (Ga. 1939).

2 S.E.2d 645 (Manry v. First National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

National Bank v. Craven
95 S.E. 246 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1918)
American National Bank v. Dure
97 S.E. 70 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1918)
Hill v. First National Bank
136 S.E. 437 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1927)
Garrard v. Milledgeville Banking Co.
155 S.E. 40 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1930)