Manry v. Farmers Bank

Supreme Court of Georgia

Manry v. Farmers Bank

166 S.E. 653, 175 Ga. 904, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 362

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedNovember 17, 1932

DocketNo. 9016

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 166 S.E. 653 (Manry v. Farmers Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Manry v. Farmers Bank, 166 S.E. 653, 175 Ga. 904, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 362 (Ga. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Him, J.

The verdict directed was the only one which could legally have been found under the pleadings and the evidence; and the court did not err in refusing' an injunction and in overruling the motion for new trial. This case is distinguishable from Doyal v. Moultrie Banking Co., 163 Ga. 140 (135 S. E. 501), and McDuffie v. Merchants Bank, 168 Ga. 231 (147 S. E. 111), which rested upon a different basis.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. B. H. Manry, for plaintiff. Willingham & Willingham, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Him, J.

The verdict directed was the only one which could legally have been found under the pleadings and the evidence; and the court did not err in refusing' an injunction and in overruling the motion for new trial. This case is distinguishable from Doyal v. Moultrie Banking Co., 163 Ga. 140 (135 S. E. 501), and McDuffie v. Merchants Bank, 168 Ga. 231 (147 S. E. 111), which rested upon a different basis.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. B. H. Manry, for plaintiff. Willingham & Willingham, for defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

166 S.E. 653, 175 Ga. 904, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manry-v-farmers-bank-ga-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack