Manrique v. Universal Finance of Miami, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Manrique v. Universal Finance of Miami, Inc.

11 So. 3d 456, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8209, 2009 WL 1531618

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 3, 2009·No. No. 3D08-1697·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of a summary judgment in a civil action. The summary judgment now before us was entered after a final judgment of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida, which (inter alia) allowed the plaintiff-appellee to “proceed in State Court for further proceedings for enforcement hereof consistent with this order.” Relitigation of the matters determined in the United States Bankruptcy Court is not permitted. See E.I. Dupont de Nemours & Co., Inc. v. Melvin Piedmont Nursery, 971 So.2d 897 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007). The [457]*457defendant-appellee has not carried the burden of demonstrating any reversible error.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of a summary judgment in a civil action. The summary judgment now before us was entered after a final judgment of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida, which (inter alia) allowed the plaintiff-appellee to “proceed in State Court for further proceedings for enforcement hereof consistent with this order.” Relitigation of the matters determined in the United States Bankruptcy Court is not permitted. See E.I. Dupont de Nemours & Co., Inc. v. Melvin Piedmont Nursery, 971 So.2d 897 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007). The [457]*457defendant-appellee has not carried the burden of demonstrating any reversible error.

Affirmed.

Manrique v. Universal Finance of Miami, Inc., 11 So. 3d 456, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8209, 2009 WL 1531618 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

11 So. 3d 456 (Manrique v. Universal Finance of Miami, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related