Manrique v. Universal Finance of Miami, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Manrique v. Universal Finance of Miami, Inc.

11 So. 3d 456, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8209, 2009 WL 1531618

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 3, 2009

DocketNo. 3D08-1697

StatusPublished

This text of 11 So. 3d 456 (Manrique v. Universal Finance of Miami, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Manrique v. Universal Finance of Miami, Inc., 11 So. 3d 456, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8209, 2009 WL 1531618 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of a summary judgment in a civil action. The summary judgment now before us was entered after a final judgment of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida, which (inter alia) allowed the plaintiff-appellee to “proceed in State Court for further proceedings for enforcement hereof consistent with this order.” Relitigation of the matters determined in the United States Bankruptcy Court is not permitted. See E.I. Dupont de Nemours & Co., Inc. v. Melvin Piedmont Nursery, 971 So.2d 897 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007). The [457]*457defendant-appellee has not carried the burden of demonstrating any reversible error.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of a summary judgment in a civil action. The summary judgment now before us was entered after a final judgment of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida, which (inter alia) allowed the plaintiff-appellee to “proceed in State Court for further proceedings for enforcement hereof consistent with this order.” Relitigation of the matters determined in the United States Bankruptcy Court is not permitted. See E.I. Dupont de Nemours & Co., Inc. v. Melvin Piedmont Nursery, 971 So.2d 897 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007). The [457]*457defendant-appellee has not carried the burden of demonstrating any reversible error.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 So. 3d 456, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8209, 2009 WL 1531618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manrique-v-universal-finance-of-miami-inc-fladistctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack