Manreb International Realty v. Imperial Roof Truss, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Manreb International Realty v. Imperial Roof Truss, Inc.

521 So. 2d 310, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 619, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 919, 1988 WL 18594

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 8, 1988

DocketNo. 87-1063

StatusPublished

This text of 521 So. 2d 310 (Manreb International Realty v. Imperial Roof Truss, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Manreb International Realty v. Imperial Roof Truss, Inc., 521 So. 2d 310, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 619, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 919, 1988 WL 18594 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s denial of the defendant’s Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.540(b) motion to set aside a default and final default judgment is affirmed upon the holdings that (a) at best, the orders in question were entered through the inexcusable actions of authorized representatives of the defendant corporation, which cannot provide the basis of granting the defendant relief, see Herrick v. Southeast Bank, N.A., 512 So.2d 1029, 1030 n. 3 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); see also California Club Realty, Inc. v. Lucca, 517 So.2d 72, 73 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), and (b) the denial of the appellant’s motion for continuance of the Rule 1.540 hearing was not an abuse of discretion. In re Gregory, 313 So.2d 735 (Fla.1975).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s denial of the defendant’s Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.540(b) motion to set aside a default and final default judgment is affirmed upon the holdings that (a) at best, the orders in question were entered through the inexcusable actions of authorized representatives of the defendant corporation, which cannot provide the basis of granting the defendant relief, see Herrick v. Southeast Bank, N.A., 512 So.2d 1029, 1030 n. 3 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); see also California Club Realty, Inc. v. Lucca, 517 So.2d 72, 73 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), and (b) the denial of the appellant’s motion for continuance of the Rule 1.540 hearing was not an abuse of discretion. In re Gregory, 313 So.2d 735 (Fla.1975).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

521 So. 2d 310, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 619, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 919, 1988 WL 18594, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manreb-international-realty-v-imperial-roof-truss-inc-fladistctapp-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack