Manpower v. Marshall University
This text of 27 Ct. Cl. 96 (Manpower v. Marshall University) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This claim was submitted for decision based upon an agreement between the parties.
Claimant seeks to recover for services rendered from January 12,1997, through March 22, 1998, in the amount of $50,316.07. Claimant alleges that respondent failed to reveal that temporary help services are a prevailing wage job. Therefore, claimant [97]*97incurred expenses not anticipated in its contract with respondent.
Pursuant to the parties’ agreement, respondent states that claimant may recover $20,000.00 based upon the finding of this Court in its previous decision in Aramark Facility Services Inc. v. Concord University, CC-04-436 (September 6, 2005).
Accordingly, the Court is of the opinion to and does make an award to claimant in the amount of $20,000.00.
Award of $20,000.00.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
27 Ct. Cl. 96, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manpower-v-marshall-university-wvctcl-2008.