Manowitz v. Kanov
154 A. 621, 107 N.J.L. 523, 75 A.L.R. 1464, 1931 N.J. LEXIS 210
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Judge Ackerson in the Circuit Court.
For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Trehchard, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodihe, Daly, Dohges, Yah Buskirk, Kays, Dear, Wells, JJ. 12.
•For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Manowitz v. Kanov, 154 A. 621, 107 N.J.L. 523, 75 A.L.R. 1464, 1931 N.J. LEXIS 210 (N.J. 1931).
154 A. 621 (Manowitz v. Kanov) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hawkeye-Security Insurance Co. v. Ford Motor Co.
174 N.W.2d 672 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1970)
Brown v. Schwartz
165 A. 100 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1933)