Manowitz v. Kanov

154 A. 621, 107 N.J.L. 523, 75 A.L.R. 1464, 1931 N.J. LEXIS 210
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedApril 10, 1931
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 154 A. 621 (Manowitz v. Kanov) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Manowitz v. Kanov, 154 A. 621, 107 N.J.L. 523, 75 A.L.R. 1464, 1931 N.J. LEXIS 210 (N.J. 1931).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Judge Ackerson in the Circuit Court.

For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Trehchard, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodihe, Daly, Dohges, Yah Buskirk, Kays, Dear, Wells, JJ. 12.

•For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hawkeye-Security Insurance Co. v. Ford Motor Co.
174 N.W.2d 672 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1970)
Brown v. Schwartz
165 A. 100 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
154 A. 621, 107 N.J.L. 523, 75 A.L.R. 1464, 1931 N.J. LEXIS 210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manowitz-v-kanov-nj-1931.