Manous v. State

1984 OK CR 95, 690 P.2d 473, 1984 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 208
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided November 1, 1984·No. No. F-83-598·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER REVERSING CONVICTION AND REMANDING FOR NEW TRIAL

The appellee, State of Oklahoma, has filed a “Motion for Order to Remand Case to Trial Court with Instructions to Vacate [474]*474Judgment and Sentence and Grant Appellant a New Trial” in the above styled and numbered appeal, conceding that a possible conflict of interest exists because Tom Giu-lioli, who originally represented the appellant later accepted a position as an Assistant District Attorney and aided in the prosecution of the appellant. See, Skelton v. State, 672 P.2d 671 (Okl.Cr.1983).

Being sufficiently advised in the premises, this Court finds that the State’s motion should be and the same hereby is GRANTED, and the above styled and numbered cause should be and the same hereby is REVERSED and REMANDED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

WITNESS OUR HANDS AND THE SEAL OF THIS COURT this 1st day of November, 1984.

HEZ J. BUSSEY, P.J.

ED PARKS, J.

TOM BRETT, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Manous v. State, 1984 OK CR 95, 690 P.2d 473, 1984 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 208 (Okla. Ct. App. 1984).

1984 OK CR 95 (Manous v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Worthen v. State
1985 OK CR 163 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1985)