Manos v. Coastal Vascular & Interventional, PLLC

176 So. 3d 1027, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 16398, 2015 WL 6696819
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 3, 2015
DocketNo. 1D14-4329
StatusPublished

This text of 176 So. 3d 1027 (Manos v. Coastal Vascular & Interventional, PLLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Manos v. Coastal Vascular & Interventional, PLLC, 176 So. 3d 1027, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 16398, 2015 WL 6696819 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order granting appellees’ motion for temporary injunction. Appellant’s claim that the injunction is overbroad is not preserved because it was raised for the first time on appeal. However, our affirmance is without preju[1028]*1028dice to appellant raising this claim before the trial court.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, SWANSON, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
176 So. 3d 1027, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 16398, 2015 WL 6696819, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manos-v-coastal-vascular-interventional-pllc-fladistctapp-2015.