Manorcare Health Services, Inc. v. Gipson
This text of 120 So. 3d 101 (Manorcare Health Services, Inc. v. Gipson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petitioners seek a writ of prohibition to review the denial of their motion to disqualify the trial judge. We grant the petition, because after voluntarily disclosing her relationship with the Manor Care facility during a pretrial hearing, the trial judge invited the parties to file a motion to disqualify and suggested that such a motion would be granted, if filed. See State v. Borrego, 105 So.3d 616, 620 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013)(holding that “where a judge makes a disclosure, invites the parties to file a motion to disqualify him, and suggests that such a motion will be granted, the motion, if filed, must be granted.” (citing Stevens v. Americana Healthcare Corp. of Naples, 919 So.2d 713, 716 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006))).
We reject respondent’s claim of waiver. Cf. Cousins Restaurant Assocs., L.P. v. TGI Friday’s, Inc., 789 So.2d 457 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (following the judge’s disclosure counsel unequivocally said that it was not a problem and allowed the hearing to continue).
Petition granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
120 So. 3d 101, 2013 WL 4006469, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 12359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manorcare-health-services-inc-v-gipson-fladistctapp-2013.