Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Manor v. Donahoo

Manor v. Donahoo

43 S.E. 719, 117 Ga. 304, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 221
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 13, 1903
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 43 S.E. 719 (Manor v. Donahoo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Manor v. Donahoo, 43 S.E. 719, 117 Ga. 304, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 221 (Ga. 1903).

Opinion

Candler, J.

It appearing that the plaintiff was detained by virtue of a criminal warrant which was prima facie legal, and that be was repeatedly given an opportunity to have a commitment trial before the magistrate who issued the warrant, which-he'expressly declined ; and the point made upon the legality of the detention going merely to the informality of the commitment under which the plaintiff was held, the court below did not err in denying the writ of habeas corpus. Penal Code, § 926.

Judgment affirmed.

By five Justices. Lipscomb & Willingham,, for plaintiff. George A. IT. Harris, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. Plunkett
110 S.E.2d 745 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1959)
Coleman v. Nelms
46 S.E. 451 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
43 S.E. 719, 117 Ga. 304, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manor-v-donahoo-ga-1903.