Manola v. Enterprise Stamping Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Manola v. Enterprise Stamping Co.

40 Pa. Super. 330, 1909 Pa. Super. LEXIS 616

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJuly 14, 1909

DocketNo. 2; Appeal, No. 200

StatusPublished

This text of 40 Pa. Super. 330 (Manola v. Enterprise Stamping Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Manola v. Enterprise Stamping Co., 40 Pa. Super. 330, 1909 Pa. Super. LEXIS 616 (Pa. Ct. App. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Beaver, J.,

Two verdicts were rendered and two judgments entered in the case of Joseph Manola, by his father and next friend, Lewis Manola v. Enterprise Stamping Co., and from these judgments separate appeals were taken to this court by the defendant company. An opinion has this day been filed in the case of the judgment entered in favor of the son, Joseph Manola, ante, p. 328. Both verdicts and judgments were in the same suit. The questions involved in both of these appeals are, therefore, the same. They have been disposed of in the case already considered and in which an opinion has been filed, supra.

For the reasons therein stated, the judgment rendered in favor of Lewis Manola, the father of the injured minor, is also affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Beaver, J.,

Two verdicts were rendered and two judgments entered in the case of Joseph Manola, by his father and next friend, Lewis Manola v. Enterprise Stamping Co., and from these judgments separate appeals were taken to this court by the defendant company. An opinion has this day been filed in the case of the judgment entered in favor of the son, Joseph Manola, ante, p. 328. Both verdicts and judgments were in the same suit. The questions involved in both of these appeals are, therefore, the same. They have been disposed of in the case already considered and in which an opinion has been filed, supra.

For the reasons therein stated, the judgment rendered in favor of Lewis Manola, the father of the injured minor, is also affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 Pa. Super. 330, 1909 Pa. Super. LEXIS 616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manola-v-enterprise-stamping-co-pasuperct-1909.