Manoil v. Salvador

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Manoil v. Salvador

22 A.D.2d 652, 252 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3135

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 8, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 22 A.D.2d 652 (Manoil v. Salvador) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Manoil v. Salvador, 22 A.D.2d 652, 252 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3135 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment dismissing the complaint, entered on March 26, 1963, on a directed verdict, affirmed, with $50 costs to respondent. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, Stevens and Staley, J J.; Steuer, J., dissents and would reverse and order a new trial on the ground that plaintiff was entitled to the best inference to be drawn from the testimony. In that view, sufficient was established to allow the jury to pass upon whether plaintiff was in fact defrauded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment dismissing the complaint, entered on March 26, 1963, on a directed verdict, affirmed, with $50 costs to respondent. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, Stevens and Staley, J J.; Steuer, J., dissents and would reverse and order a new trial on the ground that plaintiff was entitled to the best inference to be drawn from the testimony. In that view, sufficient was established to allow the jury to pass upon whether plaintiff was in fact defrauded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 A.D.2d 652, 252 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manoil-v-salvador-nyappdiv-1964.