Manny v. C. R. Macaulay Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Manny v. C. R. Macaulay Corp.

243 A.D. 720

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 15, 1935

DocketAppeal No. 2

StatusPublished

This text of 243 A.D. 720 (Manny v. C. R. Macaulay Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Manny v. C. R. Macaulay Corp., 243 A.D. 720 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Resettled order granting motion for the appointment of a receiver and to compel the appellants to pay certain rent to said receiver pursuant to a stipulation made between the parties in open court, and directing the transfer of stock, modified by striking therefrom the provision therein for the transfer to the plaintiff of the stock of the C. R. Macaulay Corporation and the provision restraining the transfer of the assets of the appellants pending the sale of the mortgaged premises, and as so modified the order is affirmed, without costs. There is no basis for the portions of the order struck out. The stipulation made in open court does not provide for such action. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Resettled order granting motion for the appointment of a receiver and to compel the appellants to pay certain rent to said receiver pursuant to a stipulation made between the parties in open court, and directing the transfer of stock, modified by striking therefrom the provision therein for the transfer to the plaintiff of the stock of the C. R. Macaulay Corporation and the provision restraining the transfer of the assets of the appellants pending the sale of the mortgaged premises, and as so modified the order is affirmed, without costs. There is no basis for the portions of the order struck out. The stipulation made in open court does not provide for such action. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

243 A.D. 720, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manny-v-c-r-macaulay-corp-nyappdiv-1935.