Manns v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Manns v. State

1973 OK CR 364, 513 P.2d 882, 1973 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 618

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedAugust 21, 1973

DocketNo. A-18047

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 1973 OK CR 364 (Manns v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Manns v. State, 1973 OK CR 364, 513 P.2d 882, 1973 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 618 (Okla. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinions

BUSSEY, Judge:

James Manns, hereinafter referred to as defendant, entered pleas of guilty in the District Court of Oklahoma County, Cases No. CRF-72-1558 and CRF-72-1596, to two offenses of Robbery with Firearms; his punishment was fixed at twenty-five (25) years in each case to run consecutively, and from said judgments and sentences a timely Writ of Certiorari has been perfected to this Court.

The sole proposition asserts that the punishment is excessive. We agree. The pre-sentence report reflects that the defendant, age 27, a college graduate, committed both armed robberies on the same evening because “I was experiencing difficulties with my wife (age 17) who was seven months pregnant. She wanted to determine how the family funds were to be spent. I had some very pressing creditors and I had to make arrangements to pay some of them.” The pre-sentence report further reflects that the defendant had never been convicted of any type offense. Although this Court does not condone the commission of armed robberies to pay one’s creditors, we are of the opinion that under such circumstances the judgments and sentences are excessive. The judgments and sentences are accordingly modi[883]*883fied to run concurrently, and as so modified, the judgments and sentences are affirmed.

BLISS, P. J., concurs. BRETT, J., concurs in part and dissents in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BUSSEY, Judge:

James Manns, hereinafter referred to as defendant, entered pleas of guilty in the District Court of Oklahoma County, Cases No. CRF-72-1558 and CRF-72-1596, to two offenses of Robbery with Firearms; his punishment was fixed at twenty-five (25) years in each case to run consecutively, and from said judgments and sentences a timely Writ of Certiorari has been perfected to this Court.

The sole proposition asserts that the punishment is excessive. We agree. The pre-sentence report reflects that the defendant, age 27, a college graduate, committed both armed robberies on the same evening because “I was experiencing difficulties with my wife (age 17) who was seven months pregnant. She wanted to determine how the family funds were to be spent. I had some very pressing creditors and I had to make arrangements to pay some of them.” The pre-sentence report further reflects that the defendant had never been convicted of any type offense. Although this Court does not condone the commission of armed robberies to pay one’s creditors, we are of the opinion that under such circumstances the judgments and sentences are excessive. The judgments and sentences are accordingly modi[883]*883fied to run concurrently, and as so modified, the judgments and sentences are affirmed.

BLISS, P. J., concurs. BRETT, J., concurs in part and dissents in part.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1973 OK CR 364, 513 P.2d 882, 1973 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manns-v-state-oklacrimapp-1973.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack