Mannor Corp. v. Zanzibar International, Ltd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mannor Corp. v. Zanzibar International, Ltd.

192 A.D.2d 306, 595 N.Y.S.2d 457, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3233

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 1, 1993

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 192 A.D.2d 306 (Mannor Corp. v. Zanzibar International, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mannor Corp. v. Zanzibar International, Ltd., 192 A.D.2d 306, 595 N.Y.S.2d 457, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3233 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.), entered June 3, 1992, which denied petitioner’s application to vacate an arbitration award and granted respondent’s cross motion to confirm the award, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The award was not irrational and the arbitrator did not exceed his authority (Twiss Assocs. v Imptex Intl. Corp., 189 AD2d 672). Petitioner’s allegations of arbitrator misconduct and partiality are not demonstrated in the record and in any event, even if meritorious, do not warrant vacating the award in the absence of a showing of any resulting prejudice (see, Rose v Lowrey & Co., 181 AD2d 418). Concur — Murphy, P. J., Carro, Ellerin, Kupferman and Asch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.), entered June 3, 1992, which denied petitioner’s application to vacate an arbitration award and granted respondent’s cross motion to confirm the award, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The award was not irrational and the arbitrator did not exceed his authority (Twiss Assocs. v Imptex Intl. Corp., 189 AD2d 672). Petitioner’s allegations of arbitrator misconduct and partiality are not demonstrated in the record and in any event, even if meritorious, do not warrant vacating the award in the absence of a showing of any resulting prejudice (see, Rose v Lowrey & Co., 181 AD2d 418). Concur — Murphy, P. J., Carro, Ellerin, Kupferman and Asch, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 A.D.2d 306, 595 N.Y.S.2d 457, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mannor-corp-v-zanzibar-international-ltd-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack