Manno v. Levi

New York Court of Appeals

Manno v. Levi

473 N.E.2d 765, 63 N.Y.2d 1018, 484 N.Y.S.2d 537, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4766

DecidedNovember 15, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 473 N.E.2d 765 (Manno v. Levi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Manno v. Levi, 473 N.E.2d 765, 63 N.Y.2d 1018, 484 N.Y.S.2d 537, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4766 (N.Y. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein, there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: whether plaintiffs were deprived of due process of law by the holding that the plaintiffs’ causes of action accrued and the Statute of Limitations commenced to run upon ingestion of the harmful drug. (See 62 NY2d 888.)

Judges Meyer and Kaye taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein, there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: whether plaintiffs were deprived of due process of law by the holding that the plaintiffs’ causes of action accrued and the Statute of Limitations commenced to run upon ingestion of the harmful drug. (See 62 NY2d 888.)

Judges Meyer and Kaye taking no part.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

473 N.E.2d 765, 63 N.Y.2d 1018, 484 N.Y.S.2d 537, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4766, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manno-v-levi-ny-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack