Mannix v. Myers
This text of 170 P.3d 1065 (Mannix v. Myers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
KEVIN L. MANNIX, Petitioner,
v.
HARDY MYERS, Attorney General, State of Oregon, Respondent.
GORDON MALLON and DAVID FIDANQUE, Petitioners,
v.
HARDY MYERS, Attorney General, State of Oregon, Respondent.
DAVID ROGERS and DANA HEPPER, Petitioners,
v.
HARDY MYERS, Attorney General, State of Oregon, Respondent.
JOHN SAJO and ANTHONY JOHNSON, Petitioners,
v.
HARDY MYERS, Attorney General, State of Oregon, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Oregon.
ORDER CERTIFYING BALLOT TITLE
ROBERT D. DURHAM, Presiding Justice.
Upon consideration by the court.
Petitioners' arguments that the Attorney General's certified ballot title for Initiative Petition No. 104 (2008) does not comply substantially with ORS 250.035(2) to (7) are not well taken.
The court certifies to the Secretary of State the Attorney General's certified ballot title for the proposed ballot measure. A copy of the Attorney General's certified ballot title is appended to this order.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
170 P.3d 1065, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mannix-v-myers-or-2007.